New CQB gun.....

http://www.airsoftpost.com/product_info.php?cPath=21_44_229&products_id=28240 THis or


http://www.airsoftpost.com/product_info.php?cPath=21_44_219&products_id=23911 this??



The G&P is probably nicer but take into consideration the price difference. Is the SRC good internally? External is not my concern, because obviously the G&P looks better. I mean would it be worth the extra 130? ive heard the new SRC gearboxes are insane.


Opinions?

Please don't just say the G&P because it looks prettier. lol.

I want feedback on both guns internals/personal experience with each.

Definitly go with the SRC, excellent weapon, internals a solid, but you should really ask Tak, he uses one. And personally I think that while the G&P has the best external quality the SRC looks alot cooler.

G&P one.


They have really improved there internals and there externals are also very nice. Defiantly the best out of those two.

SRC!!! i love my src internals should be a great gun.. but if you can get the gen 3

Go with the G&P in my opinion. Reed had a gun from them and it was beast!.

I have had terrible luck with SRC guns. They are junk in my opinion.

g&p,hands down

firby911 wrote:g&p,hands down

+1

G&P>SRC from my experiences.

Thats the Gen II SRC which is a POS, if you get an SRC get the GEN III, they are atleast comparable to G&P if not better. OTA has the Gen III guns, they are the only place i know of to get them atm.

Looking at keeping it only stock?

I would get the G&P even though the gears in them really suck! everything else is sweet on the G&P

Would not consider a gen II SRC but the gen III are truly nice!