HPA Discussion

Theoretically I could fit another regulator at the tank but I am a fan of a clean look and I don't do things by halves. Adding a regulator by the tank would make it unnecessarily bulky compared to my other method.

Also, I don't like Palmer regulators. They're decent, but they pale in comparison to an AKA Sidewinder or a Dye Hyper3. Either way, I also want to be able to fine tune the pressure more accurately, IE the reason for the LPR instead of an HPR.

Yes, I do love cockers. I used to do lots of tech work on them and I have even milled my own autococker. I had two karnivors but I never really liked them. I always went back to my orry with nexus internals. I've had 12 different autocockers over the years and I have always loved them.

ya they were very accurate..... but i didnt like using them that much bc i was a front man..

I ran an autococker setup for years as a frontman with a number of teams. I eventually changed it up and have since owned 4 egos, 2 dm4s, 3 dm6s, 1 dm7, 1 dm9, 3 shockers, 2 cyborgs, a droid and a luxe. I've used nearly everything over the years. It was stupid but I never really owned a gun more than a month and a half.

Hey spectre what do you think of the custom products regulators?

CPs are decent, but I still recommend hyper3s or sidewinders. In my experience, a CP averages +-3 fps on a chrono whereas a hyper3 or a sidewinder average +-1 on a chrono. All of my tests are done with completely broken in and well lubricated regulators. And I always use hater sauce for lining my paintball gear.

So, CP regulators are pretty solid regulators for the money but you can still get more consistency with a hyper3. It all comes down to how important consistency is for you. If you are just using it for rec games, then a CP is perfect and will perform admirably.

NJSC wrote:Because if we are not shooting 90 rps then we wouldn't have as much of a problem with our guns freezing (or exploding)

NJSC wrote:I Uh GET IT no reason to be rude about the discussion

Well obviously it didnt seem to me as though you got it so I reexplained it.

Let's be cordial, we are simply having a lively discussion.

And if anyone sees any glaring holes in my method to convert a gbb to external air, feel free to point it out. I'd hate to get halfway through and realize I forgot some major detail.

Maybe a remote (lol)

|337 wrote:Maybe a remote (lol)

There you go, you see? That's why I'm glad there are people like you around lol

Maybe get one of those old style guns with the huge air pack that you wear on your back and have to pump up with a bike pump?

NJSC wrote:Maybe get one of those old style guns with the huge air pack that you wear on your back and have to pump up with a bike pump?

I am leaning more towards the remote line idea. It is more compact.

But then you don't have an airtank on your back or the use of a bike pump

NJSC wrote:But then you don't have an airtank on your back or the use of a bike pump

I do have an airtank though. The remote line simply connects the tanks that I already have to the gun. It is just a high pressure hose that allows you to store your tank on your person rather than on the gun.